Tags:
Great if Dani should post the original banned artworks on the gospel of filth, all the stuff never made it on the official releases.

I read somewhere this cover was on the 'First day cover' - it can be this with that title -, the special edition with a slipcase. It's limited to 10 000 copies, I guess.
The banned Thornography cover had very little difference to the finished version. The skirt was shorter on the original, apparently, so they just lengthened it. Presumably a lot of retailers refused to stock it when that much leg was shown. A bit stupid really considering there are much MUCH more explicit album covers out there.
http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/news/CRADLE-OF-THORNS-FILTHY-PORNO...
Read this old interview.
"J: There was a little controversy with the art, right?
D: Apparently... it's only a few variants on it, really, it's pretty much the same thing. There was a corpse on the ground, some stuff in the background, some insinuations they didn't like... and I think the woman's legs were naked. The changes were very minor."
I've also read a lot of interviews where they only mentioned the skirt, but this one gives a little more information...
© 2010 Created by ADMIN.