Thornography banned cover?
Did that one ever surface? Did they put it in the 'Thornography Deluxe' booklet/package or something?
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Frank on -
Nah, got destroyed. But not much more interesting though...just a short skirt on the girl...
-
Permalink Reply by SirBaneDefiance on -
OMG, I want the banned cover. I heard them say the short skirt thing is the reason why it was banned, but I'm not believing that's what got it banned.
-
Permalink Reply by SirBaneDefiance on
-
Doesn't Walmart sell short skirts as well? They are so contradicting! lol
If any one has the banned cover, Just send it to me...Because the dark side has cookies.:D *raises eyebrow*
-
Permalink Reply by Matt Sutt on -
yea i want to see it too i mean there can be so much worse... look at all the goregrind covers! they could have put it inside where regular lookers couldnt see!
-
Permalink Reply by BETO on -
Great if Dani should post the original banned artworks on the gospel of filth, all the stuff never made it on the official releases.
-
Permalink Reply by Ereshkigals slave on -
BETO said:Great if Dani should post the original banned artworks on the gospel of filth, all the stuff never made it on the official releases.
We should of considered this a long time ago. : /
But I will look for it once I get my copy.
-
Permalink Reply by Uralte Stille on -
I read somewhere this cover was on the 'First day cover' - it can be this with that title -, the special edition with a slipcase. It's limited to 10 000 copies, I guess.
-
Permalink Reply by Phalanx Titan on -
The banned Thornography cover had very little difference to the finished version. The skirt was shorter on the original, apparently, so they just lengthened it. Presumably a lot of retailers refused to stock it when that much leg was shown. A bit stupid really considering there are much MUCH more explicit album covers out there.
-
Permalink Reply by Technetium on -
Nah, it's not true. I asked someone who owns it about it. The First Day Cover edition didn't include it... And neither did the Thornography Deluxe edition (this topic is so old, I bought it since then, lol).
Uralte Stille said:I read somewhere this cover was on the 'First day cover' - it can be this with that title -, the special edition with a slipcase. It's limited to 10 000 copies, I guess.
-
Permalink Reply by Technetium on
-
http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/news/CRADLE-OF-THORNS-FILTHY-PORNO...
Read this old interview.
"J: There was a little controversy with the art, right?
D: Apparently... it's only a few variants on it, really, it's pretty much the same thing. There was a corpse on the ground, some stuff in the background, some insinuations they didn't like... and I think the woman's legs were naked. The changes were very minor."
I've also read a lot of interviews where they only mentioned the skirt, but this one gives a little more information...
Phalanx Titan said:The banned Thornography cover had very little difference to the finished version. The skirt was shorter on the original, apparently, so they just lengthened it. Presumably a lot of retailers refused to stock it when that much leg was shown. A bit stupid really considering there are much MUCH more explicit album covers out there.
-
Permalink Reply by Phalanx Titan on
-
Hmm...interesting. Still, it seems the changes were pretty minor. Funny how I've seen plenty of record stores stocking Thornography that seem to have no problem with stocking stuff like Vempire too.
Technetium said:http://www.roadrunnerrecords.com/news/CRADLE-OF-THORNS-FILTHY-PORNO...
Read this old interview.
"J: There was a little controversy with the art, right?
D: Apparently... it's only a few variants on it, really, it's pretty much the same thing. There was a corpse on the ground, some stuff in the background, some insinuations they didn't like... and I think the woman's legs were naked. The changes were very minor."
I've also read a lot of interviews where they only mentioned the skirt, but this one gives a little more information...
© 2010 Created by ADMIN.
